*This is my mantra at the start of the
season, or when I go to training camp, or if I'm lucky enough to go to a
game. It burbles out of me like breathing: "Hockey-hockey-hockey!"
Before I jump into the hockey, I must share this mood elevator: jumping goat! (or lamb?) In a coat! Bringing cheer wherever he jumps!
Onward.
The Bruins did it on Tuesday: they managed to win a fourth consecutive
game, thanks in large part to David Pastrnak, who scored twice for the
second game in a row (I mentioned him from development camp last summer, saying that the "consensus is that he's a long shot to make the team this year, but not impossible"). He's the youngest player in the NHL, just back
from the World Junior tournament, and can play one more game in the NHL
before the team has to decide if they want to keep him up, or send him
back down to Providence*. Based on his recent showing, I think they have
to keep him; we'll see what they think, and do, after tonight.
*The
rule is that if a rookie plays 10 NHL games in a season, it counts as
the first year of his entry-level contract, but he can play up to 9
without it counting. Obviously you wouldn't want to play a guy in 10
games and then send him down, so the team has to be sure they want him
up for the rest of the season.
Naturally, there's been a lot of
discussion, from both the media and fans, about him, ranging from "send
him down" to "keep him up" to "trade him now," and it's getting pretty
crazy. He isn't the second coming, he isn't the chosen one, but he
brings skills and something the Bruins have been severely lacking this
season, energy and enthusiasm. I like watching him. Although they're
very different players, it reminds me of watching Bergeron in his first
season; he, too, was 18, very young to make it in the NHL, but he was
just so good. Pastrnak is making things happen, good things. He was a
plus four on Tuesday, which means he was on the ice for all four goals
the Bruins scored, and for none of the three scored against them. Nice.
And
then there's this, which someone I don't know tweeted (I saw it on Stanley Cup of Chowder), a list of the top ten players
in the NHL right now by shots per 60 minutes of ice time. Look who's on
top!
As he says, small sample size, but holy cow all the same.
Then there's this article: "Bruins face tough decision on torrid rookie David Pastrnak." I
looked up "torrid" to be sure I was right about what it meant, and
while it does mean hot, and Pastrnak has been hot, I still don't think
it's the right word for this headline.
It's
also kind of funny that, for a photo captioned "David Pastrnak smiles
after scoring his second goal on Tuesday" they found about the only
photo of the always-cheerful Pasta where he doesn't have a huge grin on
his face. Really, look at a Google Image search. He's a happy guy.
In other hockey news, I'm
afraid that my biggest reaction to this post about teams that have won the most Stanley Cups was, "Wait, there are twelve teams that have never
won?" Of course I knew there were teams that haven't won, but ...
twelve? Wow. I guess I'm more aware of the teams that have won many more
than the Bruins (grr, Montreal) than I am of those to whom the Bruins'
six are a big deal.
To end on a non-hockey note, I had a slight
headache on and off today, nothing that bad, but it's the first one I've had since
before Christmas (which, wow, it's mid-January), and it was oddly disconcerting. Like, why
does my head hurt?
Mind you, it's very good for this sensation to feel unusual.
No comments:
Post a Comment